For Which It Stands

Nuclear Energy

MYTH: Nuclear power makes Global Warming Worse                                           

FACT: Nuclear power plants produce almost no atmospheric emissions.

MYTH: There is no solution to the problem of nuclear waste.

FACT: The nuclear industry solved the nuclear waste problem decades ago.

MYTH: Nuclear power releases dangerous amounts of radiation into the atmosphere.

FACT: Nuclear power plants do emit some radiation, but the amounts are environmentally insignificant and pose no threat.

MYTH: Nuclear power results in nuclear weapons proliferation.

FACT: This claim is irrelevant inside the United States. Furthermore, manufacturing a nuclear weapon is wholly different from using nuclear power to produce electricity.

MYTH: Nuclear energy is not economically viable.

FACT: Nuclear energy already provides about 20 percent of America's electricity.

People Always say well what about Chernobyl? One of the worst ever blown out of proportion. It resulted in 50 deaths!

 Did you know we have been using nuclear reactors safely for years in our military and yet Global Warming and Environmental Groups have been allowed to control the nations fuel costs for electricity for years costing the tax payers billions.

Work on nuclear marine propulsion started in the 1940s, and the first test reactor started up in USA in 1953. The first nuclear-powered submarine, USS Nautilus, put to sea in 1955. 

  • Some 150 ships are powered by more than 220 small nuclear reactors and more than 12,000 reactor years of marine operation has been accumulated.
  • Most are submarines, but they range from icebreakers to aircraft carriers.
  •           America is falling behind in technological advancement in nuclear power due to special interest groups. The rest of the world is going to benefit and we will still being pretending there is going to be clean coal technology which is still another myth fed to us by leaders pushing an agenda to benefit friends and supporters! Follow the MONEY!!!!

    Planned Nuclear Power Plants:

    United States: 0 Not a single new plant in 30 years!!!!!!!

    China: 92

    Russia: 42

    India: 25

    South Africa: 21

    Ukraine: 15

    Japan: 12

    South Korea: 9

    Brazil: 6

           The reality is that, nuclear tech­nology is a proven, safe, affordable, and environmen­tally friendly energy source that can generate massive quantities of electricity with almost no atmospheric emissions and can offset America's growing depen­dence on foreign energy sources. The arguments that they used three decades ago in their attempt to kill the nuclear industry were wrong then, and they are even more wrong today. A look at the facts shows that their information is either incorrect or irrelevant.

    RadiationLevels.jpg
    Tom's first power point: Sources: U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commis

    Given that nuclear fission does not produce atmo­spheric emissions, NukeFree's carbon dioxide (CO2) witch-hunt focuses on other, emissions-producing activities surrounding nuclear power, such as uranium mining and plant construction. Finding fault with nuclear energy on the basis of these indirect emissions simply holds no merit. Whether the activists like it or not, the world runs on fossil fuel. Until the nation changes its energy profile--which can be done with nuclear energy--almost any activity, even building windmills, will result in CO2 emissions.

    The United States has not built a new commer­cial nuclear reactor in over 30 years, but the 104 plants operating today prevented the release of 681.9 million metric tons of CO2 in 2005, which is comparable to taking 96 percent of cars off the roads. If CO2 is the problem, emissions-free nuclear power must be part of the solution.

    Nuclear operators say they could have new British plants running by 2017, helping Britain meet its 2020 goals for combating climate change.

    To date, 439 nuclear power plants are in operation and 34 are under construction, according to figures from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

    Following are key facts about nuclear power reactors in Europe and around the world and plans for new plants to be constructed.

    NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN EUROPE AND WORLDWIDE

    Nuclear power supplies 16 percent of the world's electricity and 34 percent of the European Union's.

    15 of the EU's 27 members have nuclear power plants. France has the most plants in Europe, generating 73 percent of its electricity.

    The US has the most power plants overall with 104 facilities in operation.

    34 POWER PLANTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION

    One in Argentina, the Atucha plant near the capital Buenos Aires.

    Two in Bulgaria, both near the northern town of Belene.

    Five in China, including two in Taiwan.

    One in Finland at Olkiluoto, will be the world's largest single unit when it is finished. Scheduled to be on line by 2011, it is being built by French nuclear group Areva and Germany's Siemens.

    France has one plant being built at Flamanville in Normandy, scheduled to be on line in 2012.

    Six plants in India are being built to add to the country's existing 17 operational facilities. India plans to build a further seven.

    Iran is trying to build one plant at Bushehr on the Gulf coast in the south. It is the subject of close inspection by the IAEA and the basis of diplomatic tensions between Iran and the West.

    Japan has one power plant under construction which is being built by the Tokyo Electric Power Company. It has been delayed until 2015/16, a year later than planned to comply with tougher safety plans.


    Three are being built in South Korea.

    Pakistan has one plant under construction at Kundian in the Punjab province. This will bring Pakistan's tally of operational units to three when it is online.

    Russia is building seven nuclear power plants to add to its 31 operational facilities and is helping China with its projects.

    Two are being built in northwest Ukraine.

    The United States is building one nuclear power plant in Tennessee.

    NUCLEAR POWER IN EUROPE

    Attitudes to nuclear power vary across the bloc with Germany and Sweden committing to phase out nuclear power and new EU members Bulgaria, Romania and Slovakia planning new reactors.

    Finland's 1,600 megawatt Olkiluoto 3 reactor is seen as a test case for Europe's nuclear future -- it was originally scheduled to open in 2009 but has been delayed until 2011 due to slower-than-expected construction work.

    When complete, Olkiluoto, which will cost 3 billion euros (US$4.4 billion), will be the world's largest single unit and Western Europe's first new reactor for over a decade.

    France's latest addition at Flamanville will be the third reactor on the same site and will bring the country's fleet up to 60. Last month President Sarkozy offered to help Egypt develop its civilian nuclear technology.

    Sources: the International Atomic Energy Agency, World Nuclear Association and Statistics Finland.

    Feedback, submissions, ideas? Email postmaster@forwhichitstands.org .

    This site  The Web

    Hosting by Web.com